San Diego Family Law Certificate Of Assignment Kern
e-File your legal documents by Direct Legal Support for secure filing to California courts that accept e-Filing. Direct Legal pays the court's filing fees, on your behalf and you receive one, itemized invoice per filing. You can e-File multiple documents in a single case with the click of the mouse
Simply login to your account, upload your court documents through our site and we'll provide you a stamped, conformed copy upon acceptance from court. If you do not wish to submit your documents through our portal, you may send them in to us on your daily route, or via Customer Service email and Direct Legal Support will process your E-filing for an additional convenience fee listed below*. Be sure to attach a Direct Legal Support work order directing us to E-File the assignment for you. Click on the e-Filing Portal link to set-up an online account today!
Pricing (e-Filing and e-Service)
e-Filing (Client Submits): $9.95
e-Service (Complex Cases) $0.90¢ per party/person noticed
* Plus, Court "EFM" Fees $2.25 - $5.00*
** Plus, 3.95% convenience fee on all filing paid by credit card
**Note: Certain court require payment by credit card for filing fee and courts that accept payment by ACH will be charged $1.00 e-check fee, when applies.
Concierge e-Filing Service:
Don't have time to e-File? Direct Legal offers full service order creation, document submission, fees advanced, conformed copy receipt and cloud storage on Direct Legal WebPortal.
Simply EMAIL Direct Legal your PDF file...we got it! Contact us today for a quote, or simply login to our WebPortal to place an order!
Pricing (e-Filing and e-Service): Routine Same Day
e-Filing (Direct Legal Submits): $19.95 $29.95
e-Service (Complex Cases): $0.90¢ per party/person noticed
* Plus, Court "EFM" Fees $2.25 - $5.00*
* Plus, 3.95% convenience fee on all filing paid
*Note: Certain court require payment by credit card for filing fee and courts that accept payment by ACH will be charged $1.00 e-check fee, when applies.
California Court that Court accept e-Filing:
Butte Superior Court Calaveras Superior Court
Fresno Superior Court Kern Superior Court
Kings Superior Court Los Angeles Superior Court
Merced Superior Court Monterey Superior Court
Napa Superior Court Orange Superior Court
San Diego Superior Court Stanislaus Superior Court
San Luis Obispo Superior Court San Francisco Superior Court
San Mateo Superior Court Santa Clara Superior Court
Santa Cruz Superior Court Santa Barbara Superior Court
Sutter Superior Court Yuba Superior Court
The document is “Filed” at the date and time it is received by the court and the conﬁrmation of receipt is created. Any electronically ﬁled document received by the Court on or after midnight will be ﬁle stamped on the next court day. If you do not wish to submit your documents through our portal, you may send them in to us on your daily route, or via Customer Service email and Direct Legal Support, Inc. will process your E-Filing for an additional convenience fee, plus court filing fees as follows:
**When requested by customers, Direct Legal Support, Inc. will submit court ﬁling fees required by court rule or statute. Customers can pay via ACH (eCheck) orOpen Credit (certain terms apply) to avoid a convenience fee being charged on fees processed and remitted by Direct Legal Support in accordance with applicable law. This fee only applies when filing fees are required by the Court and the fee will be reflected on the invoice. Click herefor the California Rule of Court governing actions by the court on receipt of e-filings (confirmations, notices of rejections, after-hours filings, technical issues, etc.)
ACS email Service Interrupted – Nationwide Cyber Attacks
At approximately 8:30am PST, Attorney’s Certified Services began to experience intermittent issues sending and receiving emails. Our IT department began to research the problem and found news reports that the nation was under cyber attack. As of 2:00pm PST, the issues were resolved and email services were restored to our offices. We are asking clients who sent emails to us during this time, to confirm they were received.
MSN.com reported: SAN FRANCISCO — Multiple waves of online attacks blocked many major websites Friday, at times making it impossible for users on the East Coast to access Twitter, Spotify, Netflix, Amazon, Tumblr, Reddit and other sites. The attacks used Mirai, an easy-to-use program that allows even unskilled hackers to take over online devices and use them to launch distributed denial of service, or DDoS attacks. Malware from phishing emails can infect a computer or home network, then spread to everything on it, taking over DVRs, cable set-top boxes, routers and even Internet-connected cameras used by stores and businesses for surveillance. The source code for Mirai was released on the so-called dark web at the beginning of the month. Those are sites that require specific software or authorization to access and that operate as a sort of online underground for hackers. The release led some security experts to suggest it would soon be widely used by hackers. That appears to have happened in this case. The Mirai botnet harnesses the computing power of Internet connected devices as the engine behind its denial of service attacks. These devices then flood a particular site or service with large amounts of fake traffic, overwhelming the system and making it impossible for legitimate messages to get through.
Effects felt nationwide
The first attacks appear to have begun around 7:10 a.m. Friday, then resolved towards 9:30 a.m.. Then waves began. “It’s been a hectic day,” said York. Dyn posted on its website that it “began monitoring and mitigating a DDoS attack against our Dyn Managed DNS infrastructure.” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said the Department of Homeland Security was “monitoring the situation” but that “at this point I don’t have any information about who may be responsible for this malicious activity.”
Who and why unknown
So far Dyn has not been able to ascertain whether the attack is aimed at any specific customer. “We have no reason to believe it is at this point,” said Dave Allen, the company’s general counsel. The attack is “consistent with record-setting sized cyberattacks seen in the last few weeks,” said Carl Herberger, vice president of security at security company Radware.
A post on Hacker News first identified the attack and named the sites that were affected. Several sites, including Spotify and GitHub, took to Twitter this morning to post status updates once the social network was back online. Twitter users similarly took to the service to keep lists of which sites were down and comment on the situation. The term DDoS quickly vaulted to among the top of the site’s list of “Trending Topics” in the United States. “DDoS attack this morning takes out Reddit, Twitter & Spotify,” wrote user @Anubis8. “Work productivity increases by 300%.” “Anyone else having a whole lot of trouble with sites loading properly this morning?,” tweeted Emmy Caitlin. “Paypal is down, Twitter was down, Netflix half loading.”
How the attack works
As part of its business, Dyn provides DNS services for a given swath of the Internet, effectively its address book. DNS stands for Domain Name System, the decentralized network of files that list the domain names human beings use, such as usatoday.com, with their numeric Internet Protocol addresses, such as 18.104.22.168, which is how computers look for websites. “If you go to a site, say yahoo.com, your browser needs to know what the underlying Internet address that’s associated with that URL is. DNS is the service that does that conversion,” said Steve Grobman, chief technology officer for Intel Security. The attack hit the Dyn server that contains that address book. Dyn provides that service to multiple Internet companies. For anyone linked to a computer that used the service, when they entered twitter.com or tumblr.com or Spotify.com, via a complex series of jumps the address book is able to tell their browser which numerical IP address to look at. The DDoS attack floods that server with illegitimate requests, so many that very few real requests can get through. The user gets a message that the server is not available. Service is intermittent because a few requests are sometimes still able to go through. In addition, many sites keep cached address books their computers can refer to. However those caches always have a time limit on them and when that “time to live” expires, they must go back to the DNS server to confirm the IP address is valid. If the DNS server is unavailable, a site that was working could suddenly stop being available, said Grobman.
To view the full article, click here!
Follow Eli Blumenthal on Twitter @eliblumenthal
Elizabeth Weise covers technology and cybersecurity for USA TODAY. Follow her at@eweise.